A common test method is the pressure difference method. First, the ePTFE vent sample is fixed in a sealed test fixture to ensure no air leakage around the sample, which is crucial to avoid test errors.
- Fix the sample in a sealed test fixture
- Apply stable pressure difference on both sides
- Collect and measure air flow with professional instruments
- Simulate pressure changes from body heat and movement
Another applicable method is the constant flow method, which maintains a constant air flow through the ePTFE vent and measures the pressure difference generated on both sides of the sample.
- Maintain constant air flow through the vent
- Measure pressure difference on both sides
- Lower pressure difference indicates better air permeability
- Suitable for stable airflow scenarios
The pressure difference data can indirectly reflect the ventilation resistance of the vent; lower pressure difference indicates better air permeability under the same flow rate. This method is suitable for testing the ventilation performance of vents in scenarios where the air flow is relatively stable.
During the test process, it is necessary to pay attention to controlling environmental factors such as temperature and humidity. Changes in these factors may affect the physical properties of the ePTFE material and the viscosity of the air, thereby interfering with the test results.
- Control temperature and humidity during testing
- Use representative samples from production batches
- Test multiple samples for statistical accuracy
- Ensure consistent test conditions for repeatability
In addition, the test sample should be representative, and multiple samples from the same batch should be tested to take average values, which can improve the accuracy and repeatability of the test.
After the test, the collected flow rate and pressure difference data are analyzed and compared with the preset performance standards to determine whether the air permeability of the ePTFE vent meets the application requirements of smart wearable devices. Reasonable selection of test methods based on actual use scenarios ensures that the tested ventilation performance is consistent with the actual service effect.
